Imagine the following situation:
- You’re vacationing in Denver and must return to San Francisco for an urgent-care medical appointment
- You’re disabled but nevertheless arrive at the airport on time.
- The airport–in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act–doesn’t have anyone assigned to help disabled passengers get onto departing planes.
- As a result, you arrive at the gate–just as the plane takes off.
- The airline informs you that if you want to board a plane, you’ll have to pay for another ticket.
- You can’t afford to buy another ticke–and your urgent-care appointment is tomorrow.
What do you do?
In this case, the stranded passenger called me: Bureaucracybuster.
First, I instinctively called the airline company. And that meant starting at the top–the president’s office.
I punched the name of the airline–and the words, “Board of Directors”–into google. This gave me several websites to click on to obtain the information I needed.
I started dialing–and quickly hung up: I had just remembered the day was a Sunday. Nobody but cleaning crews would be occupying the airline’s executive offices that day.
I had to start all over.
Next, I decided to call Denver Airport and find an official who would help Rachel onto another flight–without charging her for it.
I didn’t know where to start, so I decided that starting anywhere was just fine. As I was routed from one person to another, I would develop a sense of who I needed to reach.
Some of those I reached seemed genuinely concerned with Rachel’s plight. Others gave me the “that’s-life-in-the-big-city” attitude.
One of the latter felt I wasn’t deferential enough in my tone. He threatened to notify the chief of airport security.
“Go ahead,” I said. “I once worked for the United States Attorney’s Office. I’ll be glad to talk with him.”
He backed off–just as I had assumed he would. Usually the best way to deal with threats is to directly confront the person making them.
(A friend of mine, Richard St. Germain, spent part of his 11 years with the U.S. Marshals Service protecting Mafia witnesses. Many of them didn’t like the places where they were to be relocated under new identities.
“I’m going to complain to the Attorney General,” some of them would threaten.
St. Germain would reach for his office phone, plant it before the witness, and say, “Call him. I’ll give you his number.” The witness always backed off.)
Eventually I reached the Chief of Airport Operations. I outlined what had happened.
He didn’t seem very sympathetic. So I decided to transfer the problem from Rachel to the airport.
Without raising my voice, I said: “It isn’t her fault that your airport was in non-compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act and she missed her flight because there wasn’t anyone to assist her.”
Suddenly his tone changed–and I could tell I had definitely reached him. No doubt visions of federal investigations, private lawsuits and truly bad publicity for his airport flashed across his mind.
And all this had been achieved without my making an overt threat of any kind.
He said he would see to it that she got onto another flight without having to buy another ticket.
I called Rachel to give her the good news. But a few minutes later she called me back, almost in tears.
The airline official at the departure gate was giving her a bad time: “If we have to choose between you and another passenger who has a ticket for this flight, he’ll go, not you.”
She laid out a series of other scenarios under which Rachel would remain stranded in Denver.
So once again I called the Chief of Airport Operations: “She’s being hassled by an official at the gate. Can you please send someone over there and put a stop to this nonsense?”
A few minutes later, I got another call from Rachel–this one totally upbeat.
She said that a man who identified himself only as an airport official–but wearing an expensive suit–had visited her at the gate. When the ticket-taking airline official had protested, he had cut her off.
The official had then walked Rachel and her baggage onto an otherwise fully-loaded 777 jet bound for San Francisco.
Soon she was en route to San Francisco for her urgent-care medical appointment the next day.
So if you’re having troubles with an airline:
- Start by calling the highest-ranking airline official you can reach.
- If s/he isn’t available or sympathetic, call the airport.
- Be persistent–but businesslike.
- Don’t let yourself be bullied.
- If you can cite a legal violation by the airline and/or airport, don’t hesitate to do so. But don’t make overt threats.
- Don’t hesitate to play for sympathy: “This is a woman has an urgent-care doctor’s appointment….”
Then cross your fingers and hope for the best.


ABC NEWS, ARSON, BENJAMIN CRUMP, CBS NEWS, CHARLIE ROSE SHOW, CNN, DARREN WILSON, FACEBOOK, FERGUSON, LOOTING, LOUIS HEAD, MICHAEL BROWN, NBC NEWS, RIOTING, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, TODAY SHOW, TOM METZGAR, TWITTER, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, USA TODAY
IN THE NAME OF SAINT MICHAEL THE THUG
In Bureaucracy, History, Law, Law Enforcement, Social commentary on December 1, 2014 at 12:00 amA grand jury declined to indict a white police officer, Darren Wilson, for the killing of Michael Brown, a black teenager.
And blacks in Ferguson, Missouri, erupted in looting and arson–with demonstrations breaking out in cities across the country.
These events have dominated news coverage–especially on TV–since November 24.
But there has been much that the media has not dared to mention.
Most importantly: From the beginning, a double standard has reigned in this case:
CHARGE: Shortly after the killing of Michael Brown, police released a video showing him robbing a grocery store and manhandling the its owner.
Click here: SURVEILLANCE VIDEO: Police say Michael Brown was suspect in Ferguson store robbery – YouTube
TRUTH: Blacks were outraged–not because they believed it wasn’t Michael on the videotape, but because it showed their anointed hero as a robbing thug.
Michael Brown (left) roughing up a store owner
CHARGE: Following the shooting of Brown on August 9th, police deployed massive force to prevent rioting. Ferguson’s blacks charged that it was militarized overkill.
TRUTH: When the grand jury released its findings on November 24, Ferguson blacks started looting and burning stores.
Then blacks raged that the police should have had a massive presence to keep their brethren in line. No one has conceded that originally deploying large numbers of anti-riot police had been a good idea after all.
CHARGE: Many Ferguson blacks complained that the grand jury was taking too long (three months) interviewing scores of witnesses before reaching its verdict.
TRUTH: When the verdict was released, Ferguson blacks said the grand jurors should have examined less evidence, so they wouldn’t have been confused by conflicting statements.
CHARGE: Ferguson blacks generally and the Brown family in particular have repeatedly called Michael Brown “a child.”
TRUTH: Michael Brown was 18–legally an adult who could obtain a credit card, enter the armed forces and drive a car. He also stood 6’3″ and weighed 300 pounds.
CHARGE: The Brown family has claimed that Michael didn’t have a criminal record as an adult.
TRUTH: But he may have had a juvenile one.
The citizen journalism website GotNews has filed a lawsuit against St. Louis authorities seeking the release of Brown’s juvenile record. The suit alleges that Brown was a gang member and faced a second-degree murder charge.
If true, it would explain why he was determined to avoid arrest–it would have meant his being tried as an adult.
Click here: Lawsuit seeking release of Michael Brown’s juvenile records claims slain teen was a murder suspect – AOL.com
CHARGE: Michael’s mother, Lesley Mcspadden, has appeared on a series of news and interview programs, including “Today” and the prestigeous PBS “Charlie Rose Show.” As the parent of a dead son, she has been treated with great deference, even when making such charges as “My son was running for his life.”
TRUTH: But what has not come up in any of these interviews is this: She herself could face felony armed robbery charges. She has been accused of attacking people in a Ferguson parking lot for selling “Justice for Mike Brown” T-shirts. Among the victims: Her former mother-in-law.
Click here: Michael Brown’s mom may face robbery charges: report – NY Daily News
CHARGE: Michael Brown’s stepfather, Louis Head, is a victim of his emotions of rage and grief. At least, that’s the official line of Benjamin Crump, an attorney for the Brown family:
“God forbid your child was killed …and then they get that just devastating announcement in the manner it was announced, and somebody put a camera in your face. What would be your immediate reaction?”
TRUTH: On the night of November 24, Louis Head urged his fellow residents of Ferguson to “burn this bitch down!” By “bitch” he meant Ferguson itself.
Standing atop a platform in the midst of several hundred frenzied protesters, he screamed at least 10 times: “Burn this motherfucker down!” and “Burn this bitch down!”
Head may well find himself the target of criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits.
Missouri Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder has called for Head’s arrest for inciting to riot.
And those whose stores were burned and/or looted could file civil lawsuits against Head as being liable for their losses.
A legal precedent for such lawsuits emerged 24 years ago, and still remains viable.
On November 13, 1988 in Portland, Oregon, three white supremacist members of East Side White Pride and White Aryan Resistance (WAR) beat to death Mulugeta Seraw, an Ethiopian man who came to the United States to attend college.
Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center filed a civil suit (Berhanu v. Metzger) against Tom Metzger, founder of WAR. They argued that WAR influenced Seraw’s killers by encouraging their group, East Side White Pride, to commit violence.
Tom and John Metzger were found civilly liable under the doctrine of vicarious liability, in which one can be liable for a tort committed by a subordinate or by another person who is taking instructions.
In October 1990, the jury returned a verdict—$12.5 million—against Metzger and WAR. The Metzgers’ house was seized, and most of WAR’s profits go to paying off the judgment.
Thus, a law applied to whites who agitate violence can be applied to blacks who do the same.
Share this: