Tens of thousands of Syrians are pouring into Europe, seeking escape from their fellow Islamics in Syria’s ongoing civil war.
And European countries–such as Germany, Italy and Greece–are throwing open their doors in welcome.
In the United States, 14 Democratic Senators are demanding that President Barack Obama admit at least 70,000 refugees.
That’s in addition to the 1,500 that America has taken in since the civil war began in 2011.
Prompting this is the international outcry over images of a three-year-old boy’s body lying face down on the surf on a Turkish beach.
The boy, Aylan Kurdi, his older brother Galip, five, and mother died while trying to reach Europe.
Amidst all this hand-wringing, it’s well to remember the famous Aesop’s fable about a snake and a farmer.
One snowy day, a farmer found a poisonous snake lying on a road, stiff and frozen with cold. Feeling sorry for the creature, he picked it up and placed it inside his coat in hopes of reviving it.
The snake, revived by the warmth, bit the farmer, mortally wounding him.
“Oh,” cried the farmer, “I should have known better than to pity a scoundrel.”
Decades from now, the descendants of these well-meaning Europeans may well have cause to remember that fable.
In his 2009 book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat, Dr. Peter Hammond explored the impact of an increasing Muslim population non-Islamic societies.
Dr. Peter Hammond
And he vividly outlined the increasingly disruptive changes that can be expected to occur within those societies.
According to Hammond, Islam is not a religion nor a cult. It’s a complete system of religious, legal, political, ecnomic and military components.
The religious component encompasses all the others.
“Islamization” occurs when there are enough Muslims in a country to agitate for their “religious rights.”
Here’s how it works.
(Percentages are from CIA: The World Fact Book, 2015.)
So long as the Muslim population remains at or under 2%, they will act as a peaceful minority and pose no threat to non-Muslims. As in:
United States – Muslims 0.6%
China – Muslims 1.8%
Italy – Muslims 1.5%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from jails and street gangs. This is happening in:
Australia – Muslim 2.2%
Canada – Muslim 3.2%
Denmark – Muslim 2%
Germany – Muslim 3.7%
Norway – Muslim 2.3%
United Kingdom – Muslim 4.4%
Spain – Muslim 4%
Thailand – Muslim 4.9%
From 5% of the population on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their numbers. They push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims.
They increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves–along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France – Muslim 7.9%
(On January 7, 2015, the worst terrorist act in France since World War II occurred when three Islamics slaughtered 12 people at a satirical magazine that had published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed.
Guyana – Muslim 7.2%
Philippines – 5%
Sweden – Muslim 5%
Switzerland – 4.9%
The Netherlands – Muslim 4.9%
Trinidad and Tobago – Muslim 5%
At 5% of the population they work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia (Islamic law). The ultimate goal of Islamics is to establish Sharia law over the entire world–enforcing it on Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
When islamics approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of protest about their conditions.
Any non-Muslim action that offends their interpretation of Islam results in uprisings and threats, such as in Ansterdam, with opposition to Muhammed cartoons and films about Islam.
Such tensions are seen daily, especially in such countries as:
India – Muslim 14.2%
Israel – Muslim 17.5%
Kenya – Muslim 11.1%
Russia – Muslim 15%
After Islamics reach 20% of the population nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, formations of jihad militias, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, as in:
Ethopia – Muslim 33.9%
At 40% of the population, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia – Muslim 40%
Chad – Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon – Muslim 54.7%
From 60% on, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-Muslims (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing, use of Sharia law as a weapon and Jizya, the tqax placed on “infidels,” as in:
Albania – Muslim 56.7%
Malaysia – Muslim 61.3%
Qater – Muslim 77.5%
Sudan – Muslim 70%
United Arab Emirates – Muslim 76%
After Islamics comprise 80% of the population, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some state-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the “infidels” and move toward 100% Islamic. This is happening in:
Bangladesh – Muslim 89.5%
Egypt – Muslim 90%
Gaza – Muslim 99%
Indonesia – Muslim 87.2%
Iran – Muslim 99.4%
Iraq – Muslim 99%
Jordan – Muslim 97.2%
Morocco – Muslim 99%
Pakistan – Muslim 96.4%
Syria – Muslim 87%
Tajikistan – Muslim 90%
Turkey – Muslim 99.8%
When Islamics reach 100% of the population, “Dar-es-Salaam”–“The Islamic House of Peace”–reigns.
Everybody is a Muslim, the madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan – Muslim 99%
Saudi Arabia – Muslim 100%
Somalia – Muslim 100%
Yemen – Muslim 99.1%
Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, because the most radical Muslim states wage war on more moderate ones.
Among the reasons for this: The centuries-old ethnic conflicts between majority Sunni and minority Shiite Muslims, now on lethal display in Iraq and Syria.
* * * * *
Europeans are now offering asylum to tens of thousands of Islamics–whose religion directly conflicts with Western values. And Americans are being urged to do the same.
Before doing so, these Western nations should ask themselves two vital questions:
One: If “The Islamic House of Peace” reigns when Muslims become the majority of a country’s population, why are so many Islamics now fleeing Islamic countries?
Two: What does this presage for the Western, non-Islamic countries they are now flooding into?
(3)(1)(1).jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fsilkroadsandsiamesesmiles.com%2F2011%2F01%2F26%2Froot-causes-illegal-immigration%2F&docid=undefined&tbnid=MpAe36i-e_f-BM%3A&w=576&h=421&ei=uJyeVZa6D4PwoAT3_Z2wBg&ved=0CAIQxiAwAA&iact=c)
Bureaucracybuster's Blog 
9/11 ATTACKS, ABC NEWS, ADOLF HITLER, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, BARACK OBAMA, BARCK OBAMA, BASHAR AL-ASSAD, CARL VON CLAUSEWITZ, CBS NEWS, CHEMICAL WEAPONS, CHINA, CNN, FACEBOOK, HARRY TRUMAN, IRAN, IRAQ, ISLAM, ISRAEL, MUSLIMS, NAZI GERMANY, NBC NEWS, OSAMA BIN LADEN, RUSSIA, SOVIET UNION, SYRIA, TERRORISM, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, TWITTER, VLADIMIR PUTIN, WORLD WAR 1
TEN REASONS WHY THE UNITED STATES SHOULD QUIT SYRIA
In Bureaucracy, History, Military, Politics, Social commentary on September 21, 2015 at 11:26 amThere are ten excellent reasons for withdrawing American soldiers from their current war on ISIS forces in Syria.
1. It’s been only four years since the United States disengaged from Iraq. On December 15, 2011, the American military formally ended its mission there. The war–begun in 2003–had killed 4,487 service members and wounded another 32,226.
2. The United States is still fighting a brutal war in Afghanistan. Although the United States’ military role formally ended in December, 2014, airstrikes against Taliban positions continue and U.S. troops remain in combat positions.
U.S. Special Operations troops, serving as advisors and trainers of struggling Afghan government forces, still unleash military operations against the Taliban.
3. Intervening in Syria could produce unintended consequences for American forces–and make the United States a target for more Islamic terrorism.
American bombs or missiles could land on one or more sites containing stockpiles of chemical weapons. Imagine the international outrage that will result if the release of those weapons kills hundreds or thousands of Syrians.
U.S. warship firing Tomahawk Cruise missile
Within the Islamic world, the United States will be seen as waging a war against Islam, and not simply another Islamic dictator.
4. Since 1979, Syria has been listed by the U.S. State Department as a sponsor of terrorism.
Among the terrorist groups it supports are Hezbollah and Hamas. For years, Syria provided a safe-house in Damascus to Ilich Ramírez Sánchez–the notorious terrorist better known as Carlos the Jackal.
Ilich Ramírez Sánchez–“Carlos the Jackal”
5. There are no “good Syrians” for the United States to support–only murderers who have long served a tyrant or now wish to become the next tyrant.
With no history of democratic government, Syrians aren’t thirsting for one now.
6. The United States had no part in creating the dictatorial regime of “President” Bashir al-Assad.
Thus, Americans have no moral obligation to support those Syrians trying to overthrow it since 2011.
7. The United States doesn’t know what it wants to do in Syria, other than “send a message.”
Carl von Clausewitz, the Prussian military theorist, wrote: “War is the continuation of state policy by other means.”
But President Barack Obama hasn’t stated what his “state policy” is toward Syria. He’s said he’s “not after regime-change.” If true, that would leave Assad in power–and free to go on killing those who resist his rule.
8. The Assad regime is backed by–among others–the Iranian-supported terrorist group, Hezbollah (Party of God). Its enemies include another terrorist group–Al Qaeda.
Hezbollah is comprised of Shiite Muslims. A sworn enemy of Israel, it has kidnapped scores of Americans suicidal enough to visit Lebanon and truck-bombed the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, killing 241 Americans.
Flag of Hezbollah
Al-Qaeda, on the other hand, is made up of Sunni Muslims. Besides plotting 9/11, It has attacked the mosques and gatherings of liberal Muslims, Shias, Sufis and other non-Sunnis.
Examples of these sectarian attacks include the Sadr City bombings, the 2004 Ashoura massacre and the April, 2007 Baghdad bombings.
Flag of Al Qaeda
When your enemies are intent on killing each other, it’s best to stand aside and let them do it.
9. The United States could find itself in a shooting war with Russia.
The Russians recently sent tanks and artillery units to Syria, in addition to hundreds of Russian troops. This is almost certainly an effort by Russian President Vladimir Putin to bolster President Bashar al-Assad’s embattled regime.
What happens if American and Russian tanks and/or artillery units start trading salvos? Or if Putin orders an attack on Israel, in return for America’s attack on Russia’s ally, Syria?
It was exactly that scenario–Great Powers going to war over conflicts between their small-state allies–that triggered World War l. The difference between 1941 and 2015: Today’s Great Powers have nuclear arsenals.
10. While Islamic nations like Syria and Iraq wage war within their own borders, they will lack the resources to launch attacks against the United States.
Every dead supporter of Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda–or ISIS–makes the United States that much safer.
The peoples of the Middle East have long memories for those who commit brutalities against them. In their veins, the cult of the blood feud runs deep.
When Al-Qaeda blows up civilians in Damascus, their relatives will urge Hezbollah to take brutal revenge. And Hezbollah will do so.
Similarly, when Hezbollah destroys a mosque, those who support Al-Qaeda will demand even more brutal reprisals against Hezbollah.
No American could instill such hatred in Al-Qaeda for Hezbollah–or vice versa. This is entirely a war of religious and sectarian hatred.
This conflict could easily become the Islamic equivalent of “the Hundred Years’ War” that raged from 1337 to 1453 between England and France.
When Adolf Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in 1941, then-Senator Harry Truman said: “I hope the Russians kill lots of Nazis and vice versa.”
That should be America’s view whenever its sworn enemies start killing themselves off. Americans should welcome such self-slaughters, not become entrapped in them.
Share this: