The unprecedented manhunt for cop-killer Christopher Dorner has important–and brutal–lessons to teach.
First, above everyone else, police look out for each other.
Robert Daley bluntly revealed this truth in his 1971 bestseller, Target Blue: An Insider’s View of the N.Y.P.D. A police reporter for the New York Times, he served for one year as a deputy police commissioner.
“The murderers of all patrolmen almost invariably were identified at once and caught soon after,” wrote Daley. “Organized crime was too smart to get involved in the type of investigation that followed a cop killing.
“A great many solvable crimes in the city were never solved, because not enough men were assigned to the case, or because those assigned were lazy or hardly cared or got sidetracked.
“But when a cop got killed, no other cop got sidetracked. Detectives worked on the case night and day….Cops were all ears as far as murdered patrolmen were concerned; they heard details all over the city…and fed all this into the detectives who had the case.
“In effect, the citizen who murdered his wife’s lover was sought by a team of detectives, two men. But he who killed a cop was sought by 32,000.”
Although Dorner targeted only local police officers, the Federal Government quickly poured resources into the manhunt. These included the FBI, the U.S. Marshals Service and even unmanned military drones.
Second, don’t expect the police to do for you what they’ll do for one another.
The LAPD assigned security and surveillance details to at least 50 threatened officers and their families. A typical detail consists of two to five or more guards. And those guards must be changed every eight to 12 hours.
And those details stayed in place long after Dorner was killed in a firefight on February 12.
That was a lot of manpower and a lot of money being expended.
But if your bullying neighbor threatens to kill you, don’t expect the police to send a guard detail over. They’ll claim: “We can’t do anything until the guy does something. If he does, give us a call.”
And if your loved one is murdered, don’t expect the mayor’s office to offer a $1 million reward or the military to deploy drones to find the killer.
Third, the more status and wealth you command, the more likely the police are to address your complaint or solve your case.
Police claim to enforce the law impartially, “without fear or favor.” But that happens only in TV crime shows.
If you’re rich, your complaint will likely get top priority and the best service the agency can provide.
But if you’re poor or even middle-class without high-level political or police connections, your case will almost certainly wind up in “the round file” (a wastebasket).
And it works the other way, too. Anthony Bouza, former chief of the Minneapolis Police Department, notes in his 1990 book, The Police Mystique: “When cops deal with the poor (blacks, Hispanics, the homeless and the street people) the rubber of power meets the road of abuse.”
Fourth, don’t expect your police department to operate with the vigor or efficiency of TV police agencies.
“I want this rock [Hawaii] sealed off,” Steve McGarrett (Jack Lord) routinely ordered when pursuing criminals on “Hawaii Five-O.”
Jack Lord as Steve McGarrett
But in San Jose–a city close to bankruptcy–residents can’t get police to respond to break-ins because the police department is dangerously understaffed.
And neighbors in Oakland, fed up with a slow police response, or none at all, are banding together to protect their properties by hiring private security officers.
In San Francisco, if you’re assaulted and can’t give police “a named suspect,” they won’t assign the case. As far as they’re concerned, the solvability rate is too low.
Fifth, the result of all this can only be increased disrespect for law enforcement from a deservedly–and increasingly–cynical public.
Surveys reveal that those who don’t need to call the police have a higher opinion of their integrity and efficiency than those who are the victims of crime. Among those reasons:
- Many police departments lack state-of-the-art crime labs to analyze evidence.
- Files often get lost or accidentally destroyed.
- Some officers are lazy, indifferent or incompetent.
- Police are notoriously competitive, generally refusing to share information with other officers or other police departments–and thus making it easier for criminals to run amok.
- Even when police “solve” a crime, that simply means making an arrest. The perpetrator may cop to a lesser offense and serve only a token sentence–or none at all. Or he might be found not guilty by a judge or jury.
But it is the witnessing of blatant inequities and hypocrisies such as those displayed in the Christopher Dorner manhunt that most damages public support for police at all levels.
When citizens believe police care only about themselves, and lack the ability–or even the will–to protect citizens or avenge their victimization by arresting the perpetrators, that is a deadly blow to law enforcement.
Police depend on citizens for more than crime tips. They depend upon them to support hiring more cops and buying state-of-the-art police equipment. When public support vanishes, so does much of that public funding.
The result can only be a return to the days of the lawless West, where citizens looked only to themselves for protection.


2012 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN, ABC NEWS, ARMY-MCCARTHY HEARINGS, BARACK OBAMA, CBS NEWS, CHAING KAI-SHEK, CHINA, CHRIS MATTHEWS, CNN, DAVID HALBERSTAM, DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, EDWARD R. MURROW, FACEBOOK, GENERAL MOTORS, HARDBALL, INHERIT THE WIND, JEEP, JOHN F. KENNEDY, LYNDON B. JOHNSON, MAO TSE-TUNG, MITT ROMNEY, NBC NEWS, NORMAN ORNSTEIN, OSAMA BIN LADEN, PRESS, REPUBLICAN PARTY, RICHARD M. NIXON, RIGHT-WING, Sarah Palin, SENATOR JOSEPH R. MCCARTHY, SUN MYUNG MOON, THE BEST AND THE BRIGHTEST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, THE WASHINGTON TIMES, THOMAS MANN, TWITTER, UNIFICATION CHURCH, VIETNAM WAR
THE MEDIA: WIMPS ON THE LEFT, BULLIES ON THE RIGHT: PART ONE (OF FIVE)
In History, Politics, Social commentary on February 18, 2013 at 12:25 amAnd ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
–John 8:32
The 2012 Presidential and Congressional races produced virtually round-the-clock press coverage. Millions of words–in both print and electronic media–described countless angles of those campaigns.
And yet the mainstream media bungled the most important story of the election season.
That’s the verdict of political observers Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein, who have been tracking Congress since 1978.
Click here: Dan Froomkin: How the Mainstream Press Bungled the Single Biggest Story of the 2012 Campaign
A noted congressional scholar, Mann writes and speaks widely on American politics and policymaking. His areas of specialty include campaigns, elections, campaign finance reform and the effectiveness of Congress.
His most recent book, co-authored with Norman Ornstein, is It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism.
Ornstein is a longtime observer of Congress and politics. He writes a weekly column for Roll Call called “Congress Inside Out” and is an election eve analyst for CBS News.
According to Mann and Ornstein: GOP leaders have become “ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.”
“I can’t recall a campaign where I’ve seen more lying going on,” said Ornstein. While Democrats didn’t always adhere to the truth, “it seemed pretty clear to me that the Republican campaign was just far more over the top.”
Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney blatantly lied his way throughout the campaign. Among his more noteworthy falsehoods:
Summing up Romney’s attitude toward the truth: ”We’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers,” said Neil Newhouse, a Romney pollster.
Mitt Romney
But the Republican party offered its own share of blatant lies as well, such as:
For voters to hold political figures accountable, said Ornstein, they must know the truth about those figures.
“If the story that you’re telling repeatedly is that they’re all to blame–they’re all equally to blame–then you’re really doing a disservice to voters, and not doing what journalism is supposed to do.”
By accusing both parties of waging “politics as usual” and thus creating “gridlock,” the media avoids the charge of taking partisan sides.
Their editors and producers were “concerned about their professional standing and vulnerability to charges of partisan bias,” Mann said.
For Mann, the revelatory moment came with what he called “the debt-ceiling hostage-taking.” The Republicans would “do or say anything” to hurt Obama, even if it harmed the country and betrayed core Republican values.
But this is not the first or only time the Right has lied and smeared its way into power.
David Halberstam, the late Pulitzer-Prize-winning winning New York Times reporter, has chronicled past Republican lies and smears–and the refusal of the mainstream media to address and refute them.
In his 1973 bestseller, The Best and the Brightest, Halberstam described the step-by-step decision-making process that led to the catastrophic Vietnam war.
A major reason why Presidents John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon felt obligated to send thousands of U.S. servicemen to Vietnam lay in their fear of right-wing blackmail.
Foremost among those blackmailers was Wisconsin U.S. Senator “Tail Gunner” Joseph R. McCarthy. On February 9, 1950, he flew into Wheeling, West Virginia, to begin his career as of slander and fear-mongering.
“I have here in my hand a list of 205 [persons] that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist party, and who, nevertheless, are still working and shaping policy in the State Department,” charged McCarthy.
And, then as now, a compliant media–routinely accused by its right-wing critics of being “pro-liberal”–allowed those lies and slanders to go uncorrected.
Share this: