“Hitler gave good speeches, too.”
That’s what many Right-wingers say in disparaging the oratorical effectiveness of President Barack Obama.
It’s a slogan that’s misleading on two counts.
First, the people saying it are exactly the type who would have voted for Adolf Hitler. And who vote for his wannabe dictatorial successors such as Joseph McCarthy, Newt Gingrich and Ted Cruz.
Second, the slogan dismisses the power of language–as though words are entirely divorced from action. On the contrary: Words–effectively used–can and usually do lead to action.
A classic example: During the desperate months of the Battle of Britain and the London Blitz, Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s soaring rhetoric armed his fellow Englishmen with the will to resist Nazi aggression.
The truth is, words matter. For good and ill.
Republicans, for example, have long used the power of language to gain and hold power.
Take their use of the phrase, “the death tax.”
The correct term used to be “the estate tax.” And it applied to a relatively small number of citizens who die leaving large estates.
But Republicans, struggling to make the world a better place for the ultra-rich, convinced millions of ignorant voters who don’t have estates that the tax applies to them.
The result: A Republican-introduced bill to the House of Representatives–“The Death Tax Repeal Act of 2013.”
Its goal: “To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes, and for other purposes.”
In short: Relieve the ultra-rich from the unfair burden of paying taxes.
So far, the bill has not been passed.
Or take the 2001 “USA Patriot Act,” which did pass by overwhelming margins after 9/11.
Republicans crammed this full of Orwellian changes they knew Democrats wouldn’t like–such as vastly expanding the powers of the National Security Agency to collect files on American citizens.
So how did they get Democrats to support it?
By calling it the “Patriot Act.” By choosing this title, Republicans easily put Democrats on the defensive.
Anyone who dared oppose the bill would be attacked: “Why don’t you support the Patriot Act? Are you unpatriotic?”
The Left has also made use of language to obtain its political objectives.
Consider the highly popular and Politically Correct term, “People of color.”
This is used by blacks, Hispanics, Asians and American Indians when referring to members of their own particular ethnic group.
On the other hand, members of these groups become enraged if they’re referred to as “colored people.”
But what’s the difference? It’s like saying “jeans of blue” instead of “blue jeans.”
And, in either case, it totally hides what they really mean: “Nonwhites.”
Because to the Politically Correct crowd, “white” is not a color. Which is another way of saying, “Whites aren’t really part of the population.”
And here’s another Leftist-language achievement: “The Dream Act.”
This is a phrase conjured up by those who essentially want to remove all barriers to illegal immigration–at least as it applies to those mostly in Mexico and other Latin and Central American countries.
Its effectiveness lies in the magical word “dream.” As in the Walt Disney Cinderella song: “A Dream is a Wish Your Heart Makes.”
Thus, the United States now has millions of illegal aliens (the Left prefers to call them “immigrants,” which sounds nicer) who claim to cherish their Mexican heritage and love their native land.
But if they cherish Mexico so much, why have so many of these “Dreamers” fled this “paradise”?
And why is their “dream” to never live in Mexico again?
A final word: At election time, the TV airways are clogged with ads supposedly sponsored by “Citnzens for….”
As in: “Citizens for a Responsible Energy Policy.”
The only “citizens” who can afford to blitz the airways with millions oof dollars’ worth of propaganda are “citizens” who own wealthy corporations.
And when you read/hear words like “responsible,” watch out: Who is defining what as responsible?
When greed-based companies are the ones defining responsible, it means: Whatever creates greater profits for them.
You know, like gutting environmental protection laws and allowing behemoth corporations to pay no taxes.
So keep that in mind the next time you see a slick ad that claims your fellow “citizens” seek your support on an important issue.

ABC NEWS, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, CBS NEWS, CNN, COLLEGE EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT, FACEBOOK, JOB INTERVIEWS, JOB RECRUITERS, NBC NEWS, PLUTOCRACY, RENT-A-GENT, RESUMES, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, TUITION COSTS, TWITTER
WHAT A COLLEGE DEGREE IS REALLY WORTH
In Business, Self-Help, Social commentary on May 29, 2014 at 12:15 amJune is fast approaching–and, with it, an annual rite of passage for tens of thousands of college students.
It’s graduation time again.
And look at what the average college graduate has to look forward to: On average, a debt loan of more than $29,400.
Click here: Average student loan debt: $29,400 – Dec. 4, 2013
But wait! There’s something even more demoralizing awaiting these “heirs of tomorrow.”
The discovery that for all the “we hire only the brightest” rhetoric by employers, having a college degree actually means little to most CEOs.
A new report from the Center for College Affordability and Productivity concludes that nearly half of the nation’s recent college graduates hold jobs that don’t require a degree.
In short, many of the jobs they have aren’t worth the price of their diploma.
From that report:
Increasing numbers of recent college graduates are ending up in relatively low-skilled jobs that, historically, have gone to those with lower levels of educational attainment. This study examines this phenomenon in some detail, concluding:
Click here: Underemployment of College Graduates
But the future isn’t completely bleak–at least not for men willing to transform themselves into glorified boy-toys for decadent rich females.
Consider this recent headline in AOL Jobs:
Women are Using ‘Rent-A-Gent’ To Hire Men To do Chores And Go Out On Dates
The next great job for grads?
From the ad/article:
A service called Rent-A-Gent lets women choose a male companion from a list of “smart and handsome men.”
For $200 bucks an hour, men can serve as handymen, dates, or personal chefs. The only rule? The relationship can’t get physical on the clock.
So if you want to get physical off-the-clock, that will be your risk–not the company’s
Click here: Women Are Using ‘Rent-A-Gent’ To Hire Men To Do Chores And Go On Dates
The ad claims “there are tons of guys on the site, divided into categories based on their profession.”
Among the categories listed on the Rent-A-Gent website:
Entertainers
Bartenders
Chefs
Comedians
Musicians
Strippers
Daters
Actors
Dating coaches
Philosophers
Pro athletes
Poets
Storytellers
Teachers
Dancers
Dog trainers
Language teachers
Martial artists
Personal trainers
Helpers
Bodyguards
Assistants
Butlers
Drivers
Misters Fix It
Personal shoppers
Click here: Rent gentlemen for events, bachelorette parties, sexy bartenders, handsome chefs, teachers, male strippers and dan
But a glance at their accompanying photos offers the real appeal of this site.
Consider the profile of “Eric, The Actor”:
With his shirt unbuttoned down to his chest in the classic Fabio style, he claims:
I’m an award winning NYC actor who has traveled the World for movies and for pleasure.
I recently founded my own production company. I have a vision of not only entertaining people but also of getting people to think and hopefully help foster social change.
I also love the outdoors and sustainable culture. I am also active in social causes.
And he’s also available–for $200 an hour.
So if you’re a college graduate who can’t convince an employer within your chosen profession–such as pharmacy of engineering–to hire you, there’s always Rent-A-Gent.
Or some similar agency catering to the whims of the American plutocracy, for whom $200 an hour means what buying a Snicker’s candy bar means for the fast-disappearing middle class.
It should be enough to make you hesitate before signing up for a loan to cover the average $57,000 cost of a public college education.
Or an even larger loan to cover the $132,000 cost of a private college education.
But if you’re still thinking that “employers really respect that degree,” consider this: Job recruiters spend exactly six seconds examining your resume.
According to The Ladders research, recruiters spend an average of “six seconds before they make the initial ‘fit or not fit’ decision” to interview you.
Not hire you–just meet you. You’ll still have plenty ofchances to get shot down during or after the interview.
Click here: What Recruiters Look At During The 6 Seconds They Spend On Your Resume
According to the study, when scanning a resume, recruiters looked at the following items:
American employers should be legally compelled to hire as responsibly as college students are expected to pursue an education.
Until this happens, those young men and women thinking of committing a big chunk of their time and going into massive debt to pursue a college degree should think twice before doing so.
Share this: