Adolf Hitler, Germany Fuehrer for 12 years, had a favorite phrase: “So oder so.”
It meant: “One way or the other.”
That might sound harmless. But, in Hitler’s case, it carried a sinister tone–as did almost everything else about the dictator who ruled Germany from 1933 to 1945.
When Hitler faced what he considered a problem, he said he would solve it “one way or the other.” Which meant that if he couldn’t get his way, he would apply whatever means it took until he did.
Adolf Hitler
John Boehner, Speaker of the Republican-dominated House of Representatives, seems to be channeling the spirit of the late Nazi dictator.
He has threatened to sue President Barack Obama for issuing executive orders to implement policies whose legislation could not pass the Republican-controlled House.
On June 25, Boehner said he would introduce legislation to authorize the House general counsel to sue the Obama administration. He claimed that Obama has “not faithfully executed the laws” by issuing executive orders.
“We elected a president, Americans note. We didn’t elect a monarch or a king,” Boehner wrote in a memo to his colleagues. But Boehner did not state which specific actions by Obama have been illegal.
Such a lawsuit would be a precursor to a Republican effort to impeach Obama. This would allow the Right to gain through coercion what it could not win at the polls: His removal as President.
John Boehner
And President Obama’s response: “They don’t do anything except block me and call me names. If you’re mad at me for helping people on my own, why don’t you join me and we’ll do it together.
“You’re going to squawk if I try to fix some parts of it administratively that are within my authority while you’re not doing anything?
“I’m not going to apologize for trying to do something while they’re doing nothing.
“What I’ve told Speaker Boehner directly is, ‘If you’re really concerned about me taking too many executive orders, why don’t you try getting something done through Congress?'”
Barack Obama
Obama has actually issued fewer executve orders than his predecessors–about one every 11 days, according to the Brookings Institute.
Contrast this with the records of such Presidents as:
-
George W. Bush, who issued an executive order on average every 10 days over eight years;
- Ronald Reagan, who issued such orders about once every seven days during eight years; and
- Jimmy Carter, who issued more than one order every five days during four years.
Of course, Bush and Reagan were Republicans–and white. And Carter was turned out of office after only four years by Reagan, whom Republicans still idolize.
But Obama is a Democrat–and black. Moreover, he has committed the ultimate crime of twice defeating Republican candidates for the Presidency.
On June 30, President Obama addressed a press conference in the White House Rose Garden.
During this, he outlined the pattern of Republican obstruction he has faced in winning passage of his immigration reform program.
“One year ago this month, Senators of both parties–with support from the business community, labor, law enforcement, faith communities–came together to pass a commonsense immigration bill.
“Independent experts said the bill would strengthen our borders, grow our economy, shrink our deficits.
“As we speak, there are enough Republicans and Democrats in the House to pass an immigration bill today. I would sign it into law today, and Washington would solve a problem in a bipartisan way.
“But for more than a year, Republicans in the House of Representatives have refused to allow an up-or-down vote on that Senate bill or any legislation to fix our broken immigration system.
“And I held off on pressuring them for a long time to give Speaker [John] Boehner the space he needed to get his fellow Republicans on board….
“I believe Speaker Boehner when he says he wants to pass an immigration bill. I think he genuinely wants to get something done.
“But last week, he informed the Republicans will continue to block a vote on immigration reform at least for the remainder of this year.
“Some of the House Republican caucus are using the situation with unaccompanied children as their newest excuse to do nothing. Now I want everybody to think about that.
“Their argument seems to be that because the system’s broken, we shouldn’t make an effort to fix it. It makes no sense. It’s not on the level. It’s just politics, plain and simple.
“Now thare are others in the Republican caucus in the House who are arguing that they can’t act because they’re mad at me about using my executive authority too broadly. This also makes no sense.
“I don’t prfer taking administrative action. I’d rather see permanent fixes to the issue we face.”
But since taking office as President on January 20, 2009, Obama has faced a torrent of Republican contempt and obstruction.



ABC NEWS, APACHES, BROCK PETERS, CBS NEWS, CHARLTON HESTON, CIVIL WAR, CNN, FACEBOOK, INDIAN WARS, INDIANS, JAMES COBURN, JIM HUTTON, MAJOR DUNDEE, MEXICO, MICHAEL ANDERSON JR., NBC NEWS, RICHARD HARRIS, SAM PECKINPAH, SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR, STEVEN SPIELBERG, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHIGNTON POST, THE WILD BUNCH, TOM HANKS, TWITTER, WESTERNS, WORLD WAR 1, WORLD WAR 11
WHAT THE MAJOR HAS TO TELL US
In Entertainment, History, Military, Politics, Social commentary on April 11, 2014 at 12:10 amMajor Dundee is a 1965 Sam Peckinpah Western focusing on a Union cavalry officer (Charlton Heston) who leads a motley troop of soldiers into Mexico to rescue three children kidnapped by Apaches.
Along the way they liberate Mexican villagers and clash with French lancers trying to establish the Austrian Archduke Maximillian 1 as emperor of Mexico.
The Wild Bunch is universally recognized as Peckinpah’s greatest achievement. It has certainly had a far greater impact on audiences and critics than Major Dundee. According to Heston, this was really the movie Peckinpah wanted to make while making Dundee, but he couldn’t quite get his hands around it.
As a result, Dundee’s virtues have been tragically overlooked. It has a larger cast of major characters than Bunch, and these are men you can truly like and identify with:
These men are charged with a dangerous and dirty mission, and do it as well as they can, but you wouldn’t fear inviting them to meet your family.
Major Dundee (Charlton Heston)
That was definitely not the case with The Wild Bunch, four hardened killers prepared to rip off anyone, anytime, and leave a trail of bodies in their wake. The only place where you would have felt safe seeing them, in real-life, was behind prison bars.
The Wild Bunch
Dundee is an odyssey movie, in the same vein as Saving Private Ryan. Both films start with a battle, followed by the disappearance of characters who need to be searched for and brought back to safety.
Just as Dundee assembles a small force to go into Mexico, so, too, does Captain John Miller (Tom Hanks) do the same, with his hunting ground being France.
Dundee’s men retrieve the kidnapped children and survive a near-fatal battle with Indians. Miller’s men twice clash with the Germans before finding their quarry, James Ryan.
Before Dundee can return to the United States, he must face and defeat a corps of French soldiers. Before Miller can haul Ryan back to safety, he must repulse a German assault.
Both groups of soldiers–Dundee’s and Miller’s–are transformed by their experiences in ways neither group could possibly articulate. (Miller, being a highly literate schoolteacher, would surely do a better job of this than the tight-jawed Dundee.)
Dundee’s soldiers return to a United States that’s just ended its Civil War with a Union victory–and the death of slavery. Miller’s soldiers return to a nation that is now a global superpower.
Of course, Ryan was fortunate in having Steven Spielberg as its director. With his clout, there was no question that Ryan would emerge as the film he wanted.
Peckinpah lacked such clout. And he fought with everyone, including the producer, Jerry Bressler, who ultimately held the power to destroy his film. This guaranteed that his movie would emerge far differently than he had envisioned.
In 2005, an extended version of Dundee was released, featuring 12 minutes of restored footage. (Much of the original footage was lost after severe cuts to the movie.)
In this, we fully see how unsympathetic a character the martinet Dundee really is. Owing to Heston’s record of playing heroes, it’s easy to overlook Dundee’s arrogance and lethal fanaticism and automatically view him as a hero. If he is indeed that, he is a hero with serious flaws.
And his self-imposed mission poses questions for us today:
Whether intentionally or not, in Major Dundee, Peckinpah laid out a microcosm of the American history that would immediately follow the Civil War.
Former Confederates and Unionists would forego their regional animosities and fight against a recognized mutual enemy—the Indians. This would prove a dirty and drawn-out war, shorn of the glory and (later) treasured memories of the Civil War.
Just as Dundee’s final battle with French lancers ended with an American victory won at great cost, so, too, would America’s forays into the Spanish-American War and World Wars 1 and 11 prove the same.
Ben Tyreen’s commentary on the barbarism of French troops (“Never underestimate the value of a European education”) would be echoed by twentieth-century Americans uncovering the horrors of Dachau and Buchenwald.
America would learn to project its formidable military power at great cost. Toward the end of the movie, Teresa Santiago (Senta Berger), the ex-patriot Austrian widow, would ask Dundee: “But who do you answer to?”
It is a question that still vividly expresses the view of the international community as this superpower colossus hurtles from one conflict to the next.
Share this: