The Witness Security Program owes its creation to one of the most-feared assassins the Mafia has ever produced: Joseph Barboza, who took pride in his underworld alias, “The Animal.”
It was a nickname he had lived up to. “I was an enforcer,” he boasted to the House Select Committee on Crime in 1972, “who kept the other enforcers in line.”
Barboza had done so as a top hitman earning $900 a week from the most powerful Mafia family in New England. Ruling that family was Raymond Patriarca, based in Providence, Rhode Island.
Joseph “The Animal” Barboza
But even before entering the Mafia, Joseph Barboza had spent most of his life as a career criminal. He was born in 1932, in New Bedford, Massachusetts, to Portuguese immigrant parents.
By the time he was thirty, he had served two prison sentences—one for burglary, the other for assault with a deadly weapon.
Even his jailers couldn’t restrain him. At Norfolk Prison Colony, he got drunk on illicit “hooch” and led an inmates’ riot, culminating in a short-lived escape-attempt.
When Barboza wasn’t serving time in prison, he made his living as a boxer (winning three professional matches and earning a rating in Ring magazine). He supplemented his income through a career as a freelance loanshark and extortionist.
By 1963, his growing notoriety had brought him to the attention of Enrico Henry Tameleo, the underboss, or second-in-command, to Raymond Patriarca.
Since 1948, Patriarca had been “the policymaker, judge and overlord of organized crime” throughout New England, according to a 1966 FBI report.
Raymond Patriarca
Tameleo offered a Barboza a job and fulltime income as an enforcer for the Patriarca Family. Barboza instantly agreed. He had always dreamed of becoming a “made man” of the Mafia.
(Tameleo didn’t warn him that this was impossible. Barboza was of Portuguese descent, and only full-blooded Sicilians and Italians could hold Mafia membership.)
Tameleo sent Barboza to shake down 20 nightclubs whose owners had refused to pay “protection insurance” to the mob.
The owners changed their minds after one or two visits from Barboza and his wrecking crew. Furniture would be smashed and customers terrorized until the owners began paying $1,000 a month to Patriarca’s collectors.
Meanwhile, the always fragile peace of the New England underworld was being shattered by an escalating wave of gangland violence.
In 1961, the two most powerful factions of the region’s “Irish Mafia” had gone to war. On one side was the Charleston mob of Bernard McLaughlin. On the other was the Winter Hill gang of James “Buddy” McLean.
The “Irish Gang War” triggered a police crackdown on all the New England organized crime groups—including Patriarca’s. That was when Patriarca demanded that the fighting stop.
To ensure that it did, he sent his underboss, Tameleo, to arrange a peace conference between the McLeans and McLaughlins. Both sides agreed to a truce because Tameleo was widely respected for his skills as a negotiator.
But when the conference opened in January, 1965, Tameleo was outraged to find the McLaughlins had come armed–a direct violation of the “rules of order.” Patriarca also grew furious at this spurning of his efforts as underworld peacemaker.
As a result, the Patriarca Family threw its full weight behind the McLeans.
During 1965, Joseph Barboza moved from being a “mere” legbreaker for the Patriarca Family to becoming its top assassin. His first important victim was Edward Deegan, a McLaughlin member who had raided several Patriarca gambling dens.
Barboza invited Deegan to join him in a burglary of the Lincoln National Bank in Boston. Unaware that he had been marked for death, Deegan agreed.
On the night of March 12, 1965, the burglars struck. As the four men emerged from the bank, Barboza and two cronies emptied their pistols into Deegan.
This killing proved a turning point for Barboza. He became the top hitman for the Patriarca Family and the McLean mob. He carried out more hits than any other assassin during the war. Later, in a hastily-written autobiography, he would boast of his string of killings.
(But he was always careful to describe his actions in the third-person, as though someone else had actually been responsible. In this way he protected himself against prosecution for murder, where no immunity existed.)
In June, Jimmy “The Bear” Flemmi, a close friend of Barboza’s, was gravely wounded by a shotgun blast. Barboza soon learned that the attackers had been Steve Hughes and Edward “Punchy” McLaughlin.
Swearing vengeance, Barboza quickly set out to claim his next victim. He was especially intent on disposing of Hughes, who had become the top triggerman of the McLaughlins.
On October 20, 1963, Edward McLaughlin was waiting at a bus stop when Barboza casually walked up behind him. Disguised in a wig and glasses, Barboza drew his pistol and pumped five bullets into McLaughlin.
Less than a month later, on November 11, the hitman visited the Mickey Mouse Club, a tavern in Revere Reach. This time his intended target was a bartender and McLaughlin member named Ray DiStassio.
Talking with DiStassio at that moment was an innocent bystander, John R. O’Neill. Barboza simply drew and shot both men dead.
Copyright@1984 Taking Cover: Inside the Witness Security Program, by Steffen White and Richard St. Germain


"1984, ABC NEWS, ASHLEY WARDEN, CBS NEWS, CENSORSHIP, CHILLI'S, CNN, EMPLOYEE RIGHTS, FACEBOOK, FIRST AMENDMENT, GEORGE ORWELL, HARALSON COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL, JOHNNY COOK, JOSEPH MCCARTHY, NBC NEWS, POLICE, SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAMS, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, TWITTER
FIRST AMENDMENT DANGERS
In Business, Law, Social commentary on June 13, 2013 at 12:07 amWARNING: Believing that the First Amendment gives you the legal right to express your opinion may be hazardous to your career.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Of course, that refers only to Congress. It says nothing about employers–and especially those self-appointed pseudo-gods who claim to be the personification of virtue and infallibility.
If you doubt it, just ask Johnny Cook, who until recently worked as a bus driver for the Haralson County Middle School in Georgia.
In late May, a sixth-grade student boarding Cook’s school bus said he was still hungry. Cook asked why, and the student said he hadn’t been given any lunch.
The reason: He had been forty cents short for buying a reduced lunch. So he hadn’t been given anything, not even the peanut butter offered to everyone else.
Furious, Cook vented his spleen on his Facebook page on May 21:
“This child is already on reduced lunch [program] and we can’t let him eat. Are you kidding me? I’m certian there was leftover food thrown away today.
“But kids were turned away because they didn’t have .40 on there account. As a tax payer I would much rather feed a child than throw it away. I would rather feed a child than to give food stamps to a crack head.”
Just two days later, Cook was fired over that post.
Johnny Cook and friends
The “official reason,” as given by Superintendent Brett Stanton, was that Cook had violated the school’s social media policy by daring to express his opinion publicly.
The policy states:
“Students who post or contribute any comment or content on social networking sites that cause a substantial disruption to the instructional environment are subject to disciplinary procedures.
“Employees who post or contribute any comment or content on social networking sites that causes a substantial disruption to the instructional environment are subject to disciplinary procedures up and including termination.”
This is similar to the policies–and atmosphere–of the Joseph McCarthy “smear and fear” era of the 1950s. You didn’t have to actually be proven an actual Communist, or even a Communist sympathizer.
All that was neeeded to condemn you to permanent unemployment was to become “controversial.” That way, the employer didn’t have to actually prove the employee’s unfitness.
The Almighty Employer need only declare: “Your usefulness to me is over.”
Consider the statement offered by Superintendent Stanton: “I can assure you it did not happen,” he told the CBS affiliate in Atlanta.
And how could he be so certain? Because, said Stanton, he had thoroughly investigated the incident.
“The video surveillance footage clearly shows that the student never went through the lunch lines at the county middle school,” Stanton said.
Therefore, Stanton said, the boy couldn’t have been offered the bagged lunch for students in his situation.
When asked if someone should have noticed the boy wasn’t eating lunch, he had a ready excuse for that: “When you have almost 1,000 students, it’s very difficult to notice.”
Stanton wouldn’t discuss Cook’s termination because it’s a personnel matter, but did say the school district has a strict Facebook policy.
CBS Atlanta contacted the sixth-grader’s family–who backed up Cook’s story.
Cook, who is married and the father of two kids, told CBS Atlanta that he felt in his “heart of hearts the kid was telling the truth.”
A petition has been posted to Change.org demanding that Cook be reinstated. It has so far gained more than 10,000 signatures.
Nor is Cook the only victim of employers who have no regard for the First Amendment.
Ashley Warden, a waitress at an Oklahoma City Chili’s insulted “stupid cops” on her Facebook page. In 2012, her potty-training toddler pulled down his pants in his grandmother’s front yard–and a passing officer gave Warden a public urination ticket for $2,500.
Warden was quickly fired. In an official statement, Chilli’s gave this excuse:
“With the changing world of digital and social media, Chili’s has Social Media Guidelines in place, asking our team members to always be respectful of our guests and to use proper judgement when discussing actions in the work place. After looking into the matter, we have taken action to prevent this from happening again.”
Put more honestly: “We have taken action to prevent” other employees from daring to exercise their own First Amendment rights.
Employers need to be legally forced to show as much respect for the free speech rights of Americans as Congress is required to.
Until this happens, the workplace will continue to resemble George Orwell’s vision of 1984–a world where anyone can become a “non-person” for the most trivial of reasons.
Share this: