Bill was visiting Daly City when he got threatening call from a stranger.
A resident of San Francisco, he filed a complaint with his local police station as soon as he returned to the city.
But then an Inspector named Jones told him: “You need to also file a report with the Daly City Police Department. Otherwise, we can’t help you.”
So Bill called the Daly City police–and was quickly told he didn’t need to file a report, since he had already filed one with the San Francisco Police Ddepartment (SFPD)
Angered, Bill decided to make a complaint. He dialed the main number and said, “Chief’s office, please.”
Bill didn’t expect to speak with the chief, Greg Suhr. Speaking with one of Surh’s aides would be enough.
Police departments are quasi-military organizations, where hierarchy counts for everything.
A sergeant-secretary answered the phone. Bill outlined what had happened–and didn’t hide his anger at having been blackmailed at a time when he most needed help.
The Chief’s secretary was sympathetic, took Bill’s number, and promised to get back to him soon. A few minutes later, he called back.
The secretary said he had spoken with Inspector Jones, who had tried to trace the phone number of the person who had threatened him. But that hadn’t been possible.
The number went to a Google phone exchange, which could be used by callers who didn’t want to reveal their actual number.
The next time Bill spoke with the Inspector, he detected a more helpful attitude. Still, no one in the SFPD offered Bill any advice on how to deal with an unprecedented situation.
Bill again visited a local police station. He brought a detailed, written account of who he suspected might be responsible for the threat.
Inspector Jones accepted it. Bill asked what would happen next.
Jones said he would forward Bill’s report to the District Attorney’s office. They would then decide whether to prosecute.
Bill continues to remain uncertain–of the danger he faces, of what police and prosecutors might do on his behalf. He remains alert whenever he goes out, but that’s all he can do.
Unlike celebrities, he can’t afford bodyguards. Unlike public officials, he can’t count on round-the-clock police protection.
When dealing with police, it’s best to remember the following:
Above everyone else, police look out for each other.
Robert Daley, a police reporter for the New York Times, spent one year as a deputy police commissioner. He bluntly revealed this truth in his 1971 bestseller, Target Blue: An Insider’s View of the N.Y.P.D.:
“In effect, the citizen who murdered his wife’s lover was sought by a team of detectives, two men. But he who killed a cop was sought by 32,000.”
That’s why the Mafia didn’t kill cops. Only sucidal people took on those odds.
Don’t expect the police to do for you what they’ll do for one another.
In February, 2013, a fired LAPD cop named Christopher Dorner declared war on his former colleagues.
The LAPD assigned security and surveillance details to at least 50 threatened officers and their families. A typical detail consists of two to five or more guards. And those guards must be changed every eight to 12 hours.
And those details stayed in place until Dorner was killed in a firefight on February 12.
Money makes the difference.
Police claim to enforce the law impartially. But that happens only in TV crime shows.
If you’re rich, your complaint will likely get top priority and the best service the agency can provide.
But if you’re poor or even middle-class without high-level political or police connections, your case will likely go nowhere.
Don’t expect your police department to be as efficient as those in TV police dramas.
“I want this rock [Hawaii] sealed off,” Steve McGarrett (Jack Lord) routinely ordered when pursuing criminals on “Hawaii Five-O.”
Jack Lord as Steve McGarrett
But in San Jose–a city close to bankruptcy–residents can’t get police to respond to break-ins because the police department is dangerously understaffed.
And in San Francisco, if you’re assaulted and can’t give police “a named suspect,” they won’t assign the case. As far as they’re concerned, the solvability rate is too low.
Among the realities of real-life law enforcement:
- Many police departments lack state-of-the-art crime labs to analyze evidence.
- Files often get lost or accidentally destroyed.
- Some officers are lazy, indifferent or incompetent.
- Police are notoriously competitive, generally refusing to share information with other officers or other police departments–and thus making it easier for criminals to run amok.
- Even when police ”solve” a crime, that simply means making an arrest. The perpetrator may cop to a lesser offense and serve only a token sentence–or none at all. Or he might be found not guilty by a judge or jury.
The result of all this is disillusionment with law enforcement from a deservedly–and increasingly–cynical public.
ABC NEWS, BUREAUCRACY, BUSINESS REGULATION, CBS NEWS, CNN, CONGRESS, CORPORATIONS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DISASTER RELIEF, FACEBOOK, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FERTILIZER PLANT EXPLOSION, HURRICANE SANDY, NBC NEWS, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA), OKLAHOMA CITY TORNADOES, REP. PETER KING, SENATOR JIM INOFE, SENATOR TOM COBURN, TEXAS, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, TWITTER
HYPOCRITES UNITED
In Bureaucracy, History, Politics, Social commentary on May 23, 2013 at 12:37 amTed Cruz voted against federal aid for victims of Hurricane Sandy–three times.
But the United States Senator from Texas quickly announced he would seek “all available resources” to assist victims of the April 17 explosion at as fertilizer plant in West, McLennan County, Texas.
The blast killed 13 people, wounded about 200 others, and caused extensive damages to surrounding homes.
Last October, Hurricane Sandy killed around 150 people and caused an estimated $75 billion in damage across the Northeast.
The Republican legislator stood foursquare against the Sandy Aid Relief bill, claiming that it was loaded with “pork”:
“Hurricane Sandy inflicted devastating damage on the East Coast, and Congress appropriately responded with hurricane relief,” said Cruz.
“Unfortunately, cynical politicians in Washington could not resist loading up this relief bill with billions in new spending utterly unrelated to Sandy.
“Emergency relief for the families who are suffering from this natural disaster should not be used as a Christmas tree for billions in unrelated spending, including projects such as Smithsonian repairs, upgrades to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration airplanes, and more funding for Head Start.
“This bill is symptomatic of a larger problem in Washington–an addiction to spending money we do not have. The United States Senate should not be in the business of exploiting victims of natural disasters to fund pork projects that further expand our debt.”
Another Republican, Rep. Bill Flores, who represents West, also voted against the Sandy relief package. But this didn’t stop him from requesting federal aid for the disaster in his home district.
U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas)
Cruz and Flores are not alone in their fiscal hypocrisy.
Oklahoma’s two U.S. Senators– Jim Inhofe and Tom Coburn, both right-wing Republicans–have also repeatedly voted against funding disaster aid for other parts of the country.
Oklahoma U.S. Senators Jim Inhofe and Tom Coburn
They have also opposed increased funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which administers federal disaster relief.
Both Inhofe and Coburn backed a plan to slash disaster aid to victims of Hurricane Sandy.
In a December, 2012 press release, Coburn said that the Sandy Relief bill contained “wasteful spending,” and identified a series of items he objected to, including “$12.9 billion for future disaster mitigation activities and studies.”
Inhofe, a Republican, argued that the Hurricane Sandy bill was loaded with pork.
“They had things in the Virgin Islands. They were fixing roads there, they were putting roofs on houses in Washington, D.C. Everybody was getting in and exploiting the tragedy that took place. That won’t happen in Oklahoma,” Inhofe said on MSNBC.
The Sandy relief bill initially contained money for projects outside of areas damaged by Sandy–as bribes to Republicans to get it through Congress.
But Federal relief aid is a different matter entirely to Inhofe when the victims come from his own state.
A May 20, 2-mile-wide tornado ravaged the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing at least 51 people while destroying entire tracts of homes and trapping two dozen school children beneath rubble.
For Inofe, aiding his constituents would be “totally different” from providing aid to Sandy victims.
“Everyone was getting in and exploiting the tragedy that took place,” he said. “That won’t happen in Oklahoma.”
As for Coburn: In a statement, he said that “as the ranking member of Senate committee that oversees FEMA, I can assure Oklahomans that any and all available aid will be delivered without delay.”
For Rep. Peter King (R-New York this hypocrisy is simply too much to swallow quietly.
“I think there’s a lot of hypocrisy involved here, Inhofe saying Sandy aid was corrupt but Oklahoma won’t be,” said King, whose state was devastated last October by Sandy.
For King, natural disasters such as Hurricane Sandy and the Oklahoma tornado are not “local issues”: “It’s an American issue, we have an obligation to come forward.”
He said that he didn’t plan to exact revenge on those who had denied New Yorkers aid after Sandy.
“I won’t hold it against anyone,” King said. “I don’t want suffering people in Oklahoma to be held hostage while we engage in political fights, saying ‘I told you so.’ I want to deal with it on the merits.”
All of which highlights how the principle of YIMBY–Yes In My Back Yard–is very much alive, even for alleged fiscal hawk Republicans. At least, when their own constituents are the victims in need.
Because needy constituents who go unaided quickly become angry constituents who remember that lack of aid at the next election.
It’s something to remember the next time right-wingers take a hard line on spending bills to help the poor or victims of natural disasters.
Share this: