The San Francisco Travel Association reported a total of 10.2 million visitors to the city in 2020, down 61.0% from a record high of 26.2 million in 2019.
Total spending by visitors was $2.3 billion, down 77.7 percent from a record high of $10.3 billion in 2019, including spending on meetings and conventions.
Much of the drop-off could be attributed to the Coronavirus pandemic.
But another—and major—reason lay in a subject the city’s politicians refuse to acknowledge: The overwhelming presence of what they euphemistically called “the homeless,” but which is more accurately described as DDMBs: Druggies, Drunks, Mentals and Bums.
Downtown San Francisco
Christian Mehlführer, User:Chmehl [CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)%5D
In 2012, the association conducted a survey among San Francisco residents, who named tourism the city’s most important industry.
Yet San Francisco’s political establishment seems determined to destroy its main source of city revenues.
They do so by catering to a population whose legacies include the following:
- The city’s sidewalks reek of human feces and urine.
- Pedestrians must tread carefully to avoid used hypdermic needles and empty cans or bottles of alcoholic beverages.
- Sleeping bags and tents litter sidewalks, making it hard to pass by—especially for the elderly or those using canes or wheelchairs.
- Elevators in the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system are often unusable because “homeless” people urinate in them.
- Restaurants have been forced to close because they’ve become havens for DDMBs. A Burger King at Civic Center Plaza recently suffered this fate. So did a McDonald’s in the Haight Ashbury district.
- Tourists—and residents—are daily forced to sit next to filth-encrusted men and women who reek of urine and/or feces in restaurants and movie theaters, as well as on buses.
Bum passed out near the Cable Car Turnaround on Powell
So what are San Francisco’s politicians doing to curb these offenses against public health—and the tourism industry on which the city depends?
They’re opening a series of “Navigation Centers” to invite even more DDMBs to San Francisco.
According to the city’s Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing:
- “A Navigation Center is an asset to a community.”
- Such Centers are “a form of Temporary shelter that are low-barrier and high-service, have 24/7 access, and connect clients to resources and services to help them exit homelessness.”
- Services offered include: Health care, benefits counseling, mental health care, housing assistance, substance abuse treatment and employment services.
Since 2015, eight Navigation Centers have been opened throughout San Francisco; six are in operation.
Among the “amenities” they provide:
- Meals
- Privacy
- Space for pets
- Space separate from sleeping areas
- Laundry
- Access to benefits
- Wi-Fi
While city officials increasingly cater to the drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill and outright bums who comprise most of this population, San Francisco’s reputation as a tourist mecca is increasingly threatened.
“The large homeless population in San Francisco is more of a mental health and humanitarian issue, although it has affected the tourism and related industries,” said Christian Tong, operations manager for Intrepid Urban Adventures in San Francisco.
“Whether a visitor is staying in Fisherman’s Wharf, North Beach or Union Square, they’ll most likely run into a few of the city’s homeless people, with the largest concentration in the Tenderloin neighborhood.”
“A few?”
Current estimates peg the homeless population of San Francisco at about 7,500. And it hasn’t changed much during the last 10 years. In 2019, an estimated 2,831 members of this population were sheltered. Another 5,180 were unsheltered. This made for a total of 8,011.
Many DDMBs refuse to enter the city’s available shelters. Some claim these places are dangerous—understandably since they’re peopled with drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill and outright bums.
But another reason why many of these shelters go unused is they don’t allow their guests to drink up or drug up.
The city spends about $300 million each year on DDMBs. Dividing that amount by 8,011 provides the figure of $37,448 per DDMB.
Just as roaches flock to areas where huge quantities of food is available, so will DDMBs continue to flock to San Francisco. Especially if other cities/states don’t cater to them.
And while San Francisco politicians are going all-out to provide for DDMBs, they’re fighting a war against those who feed pigeons in parks. This includes posters erected by the Department of Public Works, which read:
“Large population of pigeons is a health hazard. Our huge feral pigeon population is a health hazard and creates many problems in the city.
“Pigeon droppings dirty public spaces, do costly damage to buildings, and can spread life-threatening diseases, especially to the elderly and immune-deficient. Their nesting materials block drains and harbor parasites like bird mites. Pigeon food makes a mess and attracts rats.
“Feeding pigeons promotes over-breeding. Pigeon feeding produces over-breeding.
“Pigeons are harmed when fed. When you feed pigeons, you are not doing them a favor. They lose their natural ability to scavenge and survive on their own.
“Pigeon over population leads to overcrowded, unsanitary conditions and produces sick and injured birds. A smaller flock is healthier and does less damage.”
Substitute “DDMBs” for “pigeons” and you have an accurate description of what San Francisco’s policy toward these people should be.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Bureaucracybuster's Blog
ABC NEWS, ALCOHOLISM, ALTERNET, AMERICABLOG, AP, BABY BOOMER RESISTANCE, BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT (BART) SYSTEM, BUMS, BURGER KING, BUZZFEED, CBS NEWS, CHRISTIAN TONG, CNN, CROOKS AND LIARS, DAILY KOZ, DDMBS (DRUGGIES DRUNKS MENTALS AND BUMS), DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DRUDGE RETORT, DRUG ADDICTION, DRUGGIES DRUNKS MENTALS AND BUMS (DDMBS), FACEBOOK, FIVETHIRTYEIGHT, HARPER’S MAGAZINE, HOMELESS, INTREDPID URBAN ADVENTURES IN SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, MCCONALD’S, MEDIA MATTERS, MENTALLY ILL, MOTHER JONES, MOVEON, MSNBC, NAVIGATION CENTERS, NBC NEWS, NEWSWEEK, NPR, PBS NEWSHOUR, PIGEON-FEEDING, POLITICO, POLITICUSUSA, RAW STORY, REUTERS, SALON, SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUEPRVISORS, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF HOMELESSNESS AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, SAN FRANCISCO TRAVEL ASSOCIATION, SEATTLE TIMES, SLATE, TALKING POINTS MEMO, THE ATLANTIC, THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE, THE DAILY BEAST, THE DAILY BLOG, THE GUARDIAN, THE HILL, THE HUFFINGTON POST, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NATION, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE VILLAGE VOICE, THE WASHINGTON POST, THINKPROGRESS, TIME, TOURISM, TRUTHDIG, TRUTHOUT, TWITTER, TWO POLITICAL JUNKIES, U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, UPI, USA TODAY, WONKETTE
WHAT IS TRUE FOR PIGEONS IS TRUE FOR BUMS
In Bureaucracy, Business, History, Law, Law Enforcement, Politics, Social commentary on September 2, 2021 at 8:47 amThe San Francisco Travel Association reported a total of 10.2 million visitors to the city in 2020, down 61.0% from a record high of 26.2 million in 2019.
Total spending by visitors was $2.3 billion, down 77.7 percent from a record high of $10.3 billion in 2019, including spending on meetings and conventions.
Much of the drop-off could be attributed to the Coronavirus pandemic.
But another—and major—reason lay in a subject the city’s politicians refuse to acknowledge: The overwhelming presence of what they euphemistically called “the homeless,” but which is more accurately described as DDMBs: Druggies, Drunks, Mentals and Bums.
Downtown San Francisco
Christian Mehlführer, User:Chmehl [CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)%5D
In 2012, the association conducted a survey among San Francisco residents, who named tourism the city’s most important industry.
Yet San Francisco’s political establishment seems determined to destroy its main source of city revenues.
They do so by catering to a population whose legacies include the following:
Bum passed out near the Cable Car Turnaround on Powell
So what are San Francisco’s politicians doing to curb these offenses against public health—and the tourism industry on which the city depends?
They’re opening a series of “Navigation Centers” to invite even more DDMBs to San Francisco.
According to the city’s Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing:
Since 2015, eight Navigation Centers have been opened throughout San Francisco; six are in operation.
Among the “amenities” they provide:
While city officials increasingly cater to the drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill and outright bums who comprise most of this population, San Francisco’s reputation as a tourist mecca is increasingly threatened.
“The large homeless population in San Francisco is more of a mental health and humanitarian issue, although it has affected the tourism and related industries,” said Christian Tong, operations manager for Intrepid Urban Adventures in San Francisco.
“Whether a visitor is staying in Fisherman’s Wharf, North Beach or Union Square, they’ll most likely run into a few of the city’s homeless people, with the largest concentration in the Tenderloin neighborhood.”
“A few?”
Current estimates peg the homeless population of San Francisco at about 7,500. And it hasn’t changed much during the last 10 years. In 2019, an estimated 2,831 members of this population were sheltered. Another 5,180 were unsheltered. This made for a total of 8,011.
Many DDMBs refuse to enter the city’s available shelters. Some claim these places are dangerous—understandably since they’re peopled with drug addicts, alcoholics, mentally ill and outright bums.
But another reason why many of these shelters go unused is they don’t allow their guests to drink up or drug up.
The city spends about $300 million each year on DDMBs. Dividing that amount by 8,011 provides the figure of $37,448 per DDMB.
Just as roaches flock to areas where huge quantities of food is available, so will DDMBs continue to flock to San Francisco. Especially if other cities/states don’t cater to them.
And while San Francisco politicians are going all-out to provide for DDMBs, they’re fighting a war against those who feed pigeons in parks. This includes posters erected by the Department of Public Works, which read:
“Large population of pigeons is a health hazard. Our huge feral pigeon population is a health hazard and creates many problems in the city.
“Pigeon droppings dirty public spaces, do costly damage to buildings, and can spread life-threatening diseases, especially to the elderly and immune-deficient. Their nesting materials block drains and harbor parasites like bird mites. Pigeon food makes a mess and attracts rats.
“Feeding pigeons promotes over-breeding. Pigeon feeding produces over-breeding.
“Pigeons are harmed when fed. When you feed pigeons, you are not doing them a favor. They lose their natural ability to scavenge and survive on their own.
“Pigeon over population leads to overcrowded, unsanitary conditions and produces sick and injured birds. A smaller flock is healthier and does less damage.”
Substitute “DDMBs” for “pigeons” and you have an accurate description of what San Francisco’s policy toward these people should be.
Share this:
Like this:
Related