The purpose of this website is to highlight the ways public and private bureaucracies actually operate–as opposed to how they usually want others to believe they operate.
Occasionally, a case comes along that is so filled with blatant violations of law and common sense that it offers a road map of what others should do to avoid similar disaster.
Such a case is that of celebrity chef Paula Deen.
Paula Deen
Let’s start at the beginning.
Deen, her brother Earl “Bubba” Hiers, her company, and the corporations that operate a pair of restaurants she owns in Savannah, Georgia, are being sued by former employee Lisa Jackson.
A complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in November, 2012, claimed that she was subjected to “violent, sexist, and racist behavior” during her five years’ employment by Deen.
Jackson’s complaint describes her as a “white female” who has biracial nieces.
It was for that reason that she left Uncle Bubba’s Oyster House, which was run by Hiers, in August, 2010.
Jackson’s complaint alleges the following:
- Black employees were required to use separate bathrooms and entrances from whites.
- Black employees were held to “different, more stringent standards” than whites.
- Hiers regularly made offensive racial remarks.
- Hiers made inappropriate sexual comments.
- Hiers forced Jackson to look at pornography with him.
- Hiers often violently shook employees.
- Hiers came to work in “an almost constant state of intoxication.”
- Dean enabled Hiers’ behavior by ignoring Jackson’s efforts to discuss his behavior.
- Deen “holds racist views herself.”
The allegation that black employees were ordered to use separate bathrooms and entrances harkens back to the ugly days of the pre-civil rights South. That was an era where most blacks knew their place–or were murdered by the Ku Klux Klan.
In May, 2013, Deen gave her own deposition in the case. She denied many of the allegations against Hiers-–but ended up admitting that she was aware of his offensive behaviors:
Q. Okay. Are you aware–-you were here during your brother’s deposition, right?
A. Yes.
Q. So you are aware of the things that he’s admitted to?
A. Absolutely.
Q. Did any of the things that your brother admitted to doing, including reviewing–-reviewing pornography in the workplace, using the N word in the workplace, did any of that conduct cause you to have any concerns about him continuing to operate the business?
A. No. My brother and I, 25 years ago…each started a business and we each had $200 to start that business. My brother built the most successful long-service business in Albany, Georgia, with his $200. My brother is completely capable unless he’s being sabotaged.
Stupid Mistake #1: Deen acknowledged that, if she hadn’t known about her brother’s behavior prior to his deposition, she was present during this and thus learned about it then.
Stupid Mistake #2: Deen acknowledged that even after she officially became aware of his behavior, she did not feel there was any reason to sever him from the company.
Getting back to Deen’s deposition:
Q. Now, does his sense of humor include telling jokes about matters of a sexual nature?
A. We have all told off-colored jokes.
Q. Okay. Does his sense of humor include telling jokes of a racial nature?
A. I’m sure those kind of jokes have been told. Every man I’ve ever come in contact with has one.
Stupid Mistake #3: Deen acknowledged that off-color jokes were told in her workplace, and that she was clearly aware of it.
Stupid Mistake #4: Deen made light of the telling of jokes that the vast majority of employers would not tolerate in their workplaces.
Then came–for Deen–the most deadly part of the deposition:
Q. Okay. Miss Deen, have you told racial jokes?
A. No, not racial.
Q. Okay, have you ever used the N word yourself?
A. Yes, of course.
Stupid Mistake #5: She knew that the charge of racial discrimination stood at the very heart of the lawsuit facing her. Yet, when asked if she had ever used the N-word, she replied, “Yes, of course,” as if this were the most natural thing in the world.
Q. Okay. In what context?
A. Well, it was probably when a black man burst into the bank that I was working at and put a gun to my head.
Q. Okay, and what did you say?
A. Well, I don’t remember, but the gun was dancing all around my temple. I didn’t…feel real favorable towards him.
Q. Okay. Well, did you use the N word to him as he pointed a gun in your head at your face?
A. Absolutely not.
Q. Well, then, when did you use it?
A. Probably in telling my husband.
Stupid Mistake #6: What is discussed between husband and wife is protected legally as marital privilege. Her attorney should have objected and told her not to answer the question. If she had not admitted to using it privately with her husband, she might not have been asked if she had used it since then.
ABC NEWS, ALCOHOLISM, CBS NEWS, CELEBRITY CHEFS, COOKING, DEPOSITION, FACEBOOK, FOOD NETWORK, KU KLUX KLAN, LAWSUITS, MANAGEMENT, NBC NEWS, PAULA DEEN, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, RESTAURANTS, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE WASHINGTON POST, THEFT, TWITTER
LIFE LESSONS FROM PAULA DEAN: PART TWO (OF THREE)
In Bureaucracy, Business, Law, Social commentary on June 27, 2013 at 12:00 amCelebrity Chef Paula Deen, her brother Earl “Bubba” Hiers, her company, and the corporations that operate a pair of restaurants she owns in Savannah, Georgia, are being sued by her former employee Lisa Jackson.
A complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in November, 2012, claimed that she was subjected to “violent, sexist, and racist behavior” during her five years’ employment by Deen.
There are many lessons to be learned from the deposition Deen gave in the case in May. Such as:
Q, Okay. Have you used it [the “N-word”] since then?
A. I’m sure I have, but it’s been a very long time.
Stupid Mistake #7: Having admitted she used it in the past, she compounds her mistake by admitting she had used it since.
Stupid Mistake #8: There is an entirely legal way to avoid incriminating oneself–and being prosecuted for perjury. It’s contained in the words: “Not that I can recall.”
Q. Can you remember the context in which you have used the N word?
A. No.
Q. Has it occurred with sufficient frequency that you cannot recall all of the various context in which you’ve used it?
A. No.
Q. Well, then tell me the other context in which you’ve used the N word.
A. I don’t know, maybe in repeating something that was said to me.
Q. Like a joke?
A No, probably a conversation between blacks. I don’t–I don’t know.
Stupid Mistake #9: The vast majority of restaurant kitchens are staffed by blacks or Hispanics, whose exchanges are often obscene and homophobic. If Deen had said she had quoted such a conversation between employees, she could have legitimately claimed she did so entirely for the sake of accuracy. She could have blamed them for using the N-word, and cast herself strictly in the role of reporter.
Back to the deposition:
Q. Okay.
A. But that’s just not a word that we use as time has gone on. Things have changed since the 60s in the South. And my children and my brother object to that word being used in any cruel or mean behavior.
Q. Okay.
A. As well as I do.
Q. Are you aware that your brother has admitted to using that word at work?
A. I don’t know about that.
Stupid Mistake #10: She had previously admitted to attending her brother’s deposition, where he admitted to, among other offenses, using the N-word in the workplace. So this is a direct contradiction of her earlier admission.
Q Okay. Now, if you had learned of Mr. Hiers engaging in racially or sexually inappropriate behavior in the workplace, what, if any, actions would you have taken?
A. I certainly would have addressed it.
Stupid Mistake #11: Previously she had been asked: “Did any of the things that your brother admitted to doing, including…using the N word in the workplace, did any of that conduct cause you to have any concerns about him continuing to operate the business?” And she had replied: “No.” So this amounts to yet another contradiction.
Q. Have you ever addressed Mr. Hiers’ racially or sexually inappropriate conduct?
A. No.
Stupid Mistake #12: She admitted to having learned about her brother’s use of the N-word in the workplace–and then admitted to having never addressed it.
Q. And you are aware of his admitting to engaging in racially and sexually inappropriate behavior in the workplace in his deposition in this case?
A. No.
Stupid Mistake #12: This directly contradicts her previous admission that she had learned of his engaging in such behavior during his deposition.
Q. Are you aware of Mr. Hiers admitting that he engaged in racially and sexually inappropriate behavior in the workplace?
A. I guess.
Q. Okay.
A. If I was sitting here I would have heard it.
Stupid Mistake #13: She admits once again to having been apprised of her brother’s offensive behavior.
Q. Okay. Well, have you done anything about what you heard him admit to doing?
A. My brother and I have had conversations. My brother is not a bad person. Do humans behave inappropriately? At times, yes. I don’t know one person that has not. My brother is a good man. Have we told jokes? have we said things that we should not have said, that–yes, we all have. We all have done that, every one of us.
Stupid Mistake #14: She admits to having talked with her brother about his offensive behavior–but she did not say she did anything to stop it or punish him for it.
Q. You said you have had such conversations with [your brother]. When did you do so?
A. When Karl told me he was stealing, I addressed that with Bubba.
Q. And as a result of Mr. Hiers stealing, he received a pay increase and the money he had taken was recharacterized as wages, is that correct?
A. I don’t know how it was settled. I know that Karl was paying Lisa Jackson more than my brother was being paid, so if there was a salary increase, it would have been long overdue.
Stupid Mistake #15: She admits that even though she learned that one of her employees was stealing from her, she had nevertheless retained him.
Share this: